ASK NJ Media Co.

Dear Monmouth County Prosecutor's Office,

This is a request for public records made under OPRA and the common law right of access. I am not required to fill out an official form. Please acknowledge receipt of this message.
Records requested:

Please send your response in PDF format.

1. Copies of any police CAD report(s) with narrative(s), police incident reports, arrest report(s) criminal charge complaint(s), affidavit(s) of probable cause, and indictments against defendant Daquan D. Beerman.

Date: 05/10/2020
w. 20200004171334
*Agg Assault- On Law Enforcement Officer
Code: 2C:1B (5) (B)
*Poss of Weapon for Unlawful
Code: 2C:39-4D
*Unlawful Poss Weapon- O
Code: 2C:39-5D

Please include a Record Index with your response.
*A record index that identifies each record requested and the specific legal basis for a denial of access (including redactions) to each record.

Yours faithfully,

ASK NJ Media Co.

Mary Juliano, Monmouth County Prosecutor's Office

1 Attachment

Attached please find records responsive to the below public record


Arrest report, complaints, affidavits of probable cause are provided with
telephone, driver's license, and social security numbers redacted in
accordance with N.J.S.A. 47:1A-5(a).


A CAD is attached, with redactions pursuant to the "criminal investigatory
record" exception, N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1.1., as interpreted and applied to CAD
reports in North Jersey Media Group, Inc. v. Township of Lyndhurst, 441
N.J. Super. 70, 105-07 (App. Div. 2015), rev'd on other grounds, 229 N.J.
541, 569 n.6 (2017).


The request for police incident reports is denied pursuant to the
"criminal investigatory record" exception.  N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1.1; see North
Jersey Media Group, Inc. v. Township of Lyndhurst, 229 N.J. 541, 569
(2017) (investigative reports and witness statements about criminal
incident "fall within the 'criminal investigatory record exception'");
Serrano v. South Brunswick Twp, 358 N.J. Super. 356-57, 360, 370 (App.
Div. 2003) (affirming dismissal of portion of complaint regarding
non-disclosure of police and EMT reports, on the ground such documents
were "criminal investigatory records").


This case was remanded to municipal court today.  Request for indictment
is denied for lack of a responsive record.


show quoted sections